| By Charles E. Brown | Article Rating: |
|
| November 18, 2004 12:00 AM EST | Reads: |
17,313 |
In the October issue of this journal, we had a small error; John Bland's fine article entitled "A Little OOP, CF Style" ended up with the classification of Flash ActionScript. Unfortunately it was not caught until the edition was in print. However, when I reviewed the article, I was struck by the fact that many of the OOP concepts John discussed, while putting them in a ColdFusion context, were equally applicable to ActionScript. As a matter of fact, John makes allusions to that very point.
As all of our technologies advance, it is getting harder to differentiate between them. ActionScript is very close, in syntax, to Java; which is very close to the C++ language. We will soon see ColdFusion looking more like ActionScript/Java/C++.
As these technologies grow closer, the ability to seamlessly merge them will also become easier. We already see Flash serving as the graphical user interface to Java applications, lessening the need for the Java applet. What could be more ideal than delivering the power of Java with the low-bandwidth flexibility of Flash? Macromedia's new product, Flex, is certainly taking us in the direction of merging divergent technology.
As industry professionals, we face a number of challenges for the future. First, we must accept that the old categories are quickly eroding away. To be serious developers, we need to have knowledge of multiple technologies. In my opinion, knowledge of Flash ActionScript 2.0 demands knowledge of Java. Second, we must realize that the distinction between designer and developer is slowly going away. Increasingly, graphics people must know some programming, and programmers must understand graphic concepts. Rest assured that for many the learning curve is going to be long and hard. But, in my opinion, this future is now carved in stone.
In September, I had the pleasure of speaking at the MXimize conference in Boston. Here we saw workshops for these seemingly divergent technologies. I delivered workshops on CSS, Dreamweaver Behaviors, and moving away from the Flash Timeline. Tom Green spoke about Flash Video while Joseph Lowrey and Art Phillips spoke about RAD (Art's series on RAD started in MXDJ October as well). Our own Dave McFarland, Dreamweaver section editor, spoke about Dreamweaver design concepts.
Conferences such as this, and the MAX conference just held, are important. I find that the interaction of the participants can be a shot of adrenalin. I was amazed at how many people, who had never met each other before, were exchanging business cards and networking with each other.
We will be repeating this conference in Orlando, Florida, December 14-16. I sincerely hope I will see many of you there (www.mximizeconference.com).
With all of these technologies coming together, education is going to be a major factor. As industry professionals, we must work constantly to update our skills to keep them fresh and marketable. In addition, training needs to be delivered to the end users of the products we are developing. Programs such as RoboDemo 5.0 are making major strides in delivering this needed training in a cost-efficient manner.
By the time you receive this issue, a new version of RoboDemo will be available. Not only will it have a new look and feel, but it will have a new name: Captivate. This product will have the ability to tightly integrate with Flash. Once again, we are seeing technologies merging. In my opinion, this is going to be a major topic within the e-learning community. In that light, we will develop a new section devoted to Captivate, headed by noted author Tom Green. Tom has already shown me some fascinating uses for this newly updated technology -- in fact, this issue of MXDJ has a review of Captivate.
Next month, I'll discuss the exciting plans we have for MXDJ in 2005.
Hope to see you all in Orlando.
Published November 18, 2004 Reads 17,313
Copyright © 2004 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Charles E. Brown
Charles E. Brown is the former editor-in-chief of MX Developer's Journal. He is the author of Fireworks MX from Zero to Hero and Beginning Dreamweaver MX. He also contributed to The Macromedia Studio MX Bible. Charles is a senior trainer for FMC on the MX product family.
![]() |
Jeff Houser 11/24/04 10:18:27 PM EST | |||
I just want to add, that I agree the mechanics between Java and JavaScript are quite different. My interpertation of your article was that you were saying the exact opposite, though. "As all of our technologies advance, it is getting harder to differentiate between them." |
||||
![]() |
Charles E. Brown 11/24/04 09:37:31 AM EST | |||
Jeff: If you take a look here you will see a discussion of the differences between AS2 and JavaScript. Also, notice that Macromedia refers readers to the Sun-Java site for further tutorials. Please remember that there are syntax similarities between Java and JavaScript. However, the mechanics are quite different and AS2 is much closer to Java in concept. Hope everyone has a great Thanksgiving, Charles |
||||
![]() |
Jeff Houser 11/24/04 08:43:35 AM EST | |||
I also thought this article was a bit silly. ActionScript is ECMA compliant, as is JavaScript, which means they are, in essence, the same language, just with different Document Object Models. The assertion that ColdFusion is going to follow this route is absurd. Part of ColdFusion's success is it's ease of use for non-programmer folk. Ditching the tag-based syntax in favor of a script-based syntax would be ludricious at best, suicide at worst. CFScript, exists, of course, and is similar to JavaScript, but I don't expect to see that replacing the tag-based syntax. Does anyone edit the editor? |
||||
![]() |
Charles E. Brown 11/23/04 05:38:43 PM EST | |||
Brian: Thank you for your comments. I feel that AS2 goes beyond just some syntax similarities. The concepts are very close to Java (as are most OOP programs now). You build class files, instantiate them, have objects interacting with each other, inheritance, encapsulation, etc. Java is the defacto OOP standard and AS2 is very much building on that standard as an OOP program. As a matter of fact, I am using a lot of my Java knowledge with AS2 now. Thanks for the comments. Charles |
||||
![]() |
Brian 11/23/04 03:00:41 PM EST | |||
Saying that a knowlege of AS 2 requires a knowlege of Java is a bit silly. They are similar in syntax but the similarities end there.. |
||||
- Contrary Opinion: Why Silverlight is Good for Adobe
- Ulitzer Live! New Media Conference & Expo
- Ulitzer.com Named Exclusive "New Media" Sponsor of Cloud Computing Conference & Expo
- My Thoughts on Ulitzer
- Analytics for Adobe Air Applications
- Adobe’s Aiming ColdFusion at Multiple Clouds
- Eval JavaScript in a Global Context
- Fig Leaf Software to Exhibit at Government IT Conference & Expo
- Software Flexibility in the Cloud - Part 4 of 5
- Cloud Executives Feature on Cloud Computing Expo Power Panel
- AJAX World RIA Conference & Expo Kicks Off in New York City
- Java Kicks Ruby on Rails in the Butt
- Interviewing Java Developers With Tears in My Eyes
- Adobe Enters Cloud Computing with LiveCycle
- Social Media Terrorists
- Adobe Flash Media Server on iPhone
- Ruby-on-Rails Apps Get Cloud Lift
- Contrary Opinion: Why Silverlight is Good for Adobe
- Adobe Flex 4 Goes to Public Beta
- Flexing Your .NET 3.5 Skillset
- Where Are RIA Technologies Headed in 2008?
- Cover Story: How to Increase the Frame Rates of Your Flash Movies
- AJAX World RIA Conference & Expo Kicks Off in New York City
- Your First Adobe Flex Application with a ColdFusion Backend
- Adobe Flex 2: Advanced DataGrid
- i-Technology Blog: Death-Knell For "Rich Media? Hardly!
- Adobe/Macromedia - Microsoft, Look Out!
- How To Create a Photo Slide Show ...
- Adobe Flex Interface Customization - Themes, Styles, Skins
- Personal Branding Checklist



































